mirror of
https://github.com/nsnail/Ocelot.git
synced 2025-04-22 18:22:49 +08:00
Fixed typo there => their (#763)
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed3b6f41ab
commit
5067c96229
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The main reasons why I don't think Swagger makes sense is we already hand roll o
|
|||||||
If we want people developing against Ocelot to be able to see what routes are available then either share the ocelot.json
|
If we want people developing against Ocelot to be able to see what routes are available then either share the ocelot.json
|
||||||
with them (This should be as easy as granting access to a repo etc) or use the Ocelot administration API so that they can query Ocelot for the configuration.
|
with them (This should be as easy as granting access to a repo etc) or use the Ocelot administration API so that they can query Ocelot for the configuration.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In addition to this many people will configure Ocelot to proxy all traffic like /products/{everything} to there product service
|
In addition to this many people will configure Ocelot to proxy all traffic like /products/{everything} to their product service
|
||||||
and you would not be describing what is actually available if you parsed this and turned it into a Swagger path. Also Ocelot has
|
and you would not be describing what is actually available if you parsed this and turned it into a Swagger path. Also Ocelot has
|
||||||
no concept of the models that the downstream services can return and linking to the above problem the same endpoint can return
|
no concept of the models that the downstream services can return and linking to the above problem the same endpoint can return
|
||||||
multiple models. Ocelot does not know what models might be used in POST, PUT etc so it all gets a bit messy and finally the Swashbuckle
|
multiple models. Ocelot does not know what models might be used in POST, PUT etc so it all gets a bit messy and finally the Swashbuckle
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user